ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: We report the first case in Argentina of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin and nonsusceptibility to daptomycin. CASE REPORT: A male patient with a history of chronic renal failure on hemodialysis and hip fracture osteosynthesis was admitted to hospital for persistent febrile syndrome following the displacement of the prosthesis by trauma. Blood cultures grew community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. During treatment with vancomycin and daptomycin, a gradual increase in vancomycin MIC of 1 Ag/ml (VSSA) to 2 Ag/ml (h-VISA) and 4 Ag/ml (VISA) was observed, as well as the emergence of non-susceptibility to daptomycin (MIC = 4 Ag/ml). By suspending vancomycin and daptomycin, the strain reversed to the susceptible phenotype to both drugs. It is mandatory to evaluate by MIC the susceptibility to vancomycin and daptomycin during treatment when these drugs are used as therapy.
Subject(s)
Daptomycin/pharmacology , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Vancomycin/pharmacology , Young Adult , Argentina , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity TestsABSTRACT
Objetivo. Evaluar la capacidad de 17 laboratorios nacionales de referencia que participan en el Programa Latinoamericano de Control de Calidad en Bacteriología y Resistencia a los Antimicrobianos (LA-EQAS) para detectar mecanismos de resistencia emergentes, a saber: resistencia de enterobacterias a carbapenemes por presencia de Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemasa (KPC); resistencia de enterobacterias a carbapenemes por presencia de metalobetalactamasas (MBL) tipo IMP, y resistencia intermedia a vancomicina de aislamientos de Staphylococcus aureus (VISA). Métodos. Se enviaron los siguientes tres aislamientos a los 17 laboratorios participantes del LA-EQAS: Klebsiella pneumoniae OPS-161 productor de KPC, Enterobacter cloacae OPS-166 productor de IMP y S. aureus OPS-165 con resistencia intermedia a vancomicina. Se evaluó la interpretación de las pruebas de sensibilidad y detección del mecanismo de resistencia y el tamaño de los halos de inhibición (método de difusión por discos) o valor de la concentración inhibitoria mínima (CIM). Resultados. La concordancia en la detección de los mecanismos de resistencia fue de 76,4%, 73,3% y 66,7% con respecto a la cepas K. pneumoniae OPS-161, E. cloacae OPS-166 y S. aureus OPS-165, respectivamente. La concordancia entre las zonas de inhibición obtenidas por los laboratorios participantes y los rangos establecidos por el laboratorio coordinador fue aceptable en los tres aislamientos, ya que alcanzó 90,8%, 92,8% y 88,9%, respectivamente, para cada cepa. Conclusiones. La concordancia global en la detección de los mecanismos de resistencia KPC, MBL y VISA fue de 72,1%. Consideramos que los laboratorios nacionales de referencia de América Latina son capaces de reconocer estos mecanismos de resistencia emergentes y se espera que en el futuro la concordancia alcance su nivel máximo.
Objective. To evaluate the capability of 17 national reference laboratories participating in the Latin American Quality Control Program in Bacteriology and Antibiotic Resistance (LA-EQAS) to detect emerging resistance mechanisms namely: resistance of enterobacteria to carbapenems due to the presence of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) type IMP, and intermediate resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolates to vancomycin (vancomycinintermediate resistant S. aureusVISA). Methods. The following three isolates were sent to the 17 participating LA-EQAS laboratories: KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae PAHO-161, IMP-producing Enterobacter cloacae PAHO-166, and S. aureus PAHO-165 with intermediate resistance to vancomycin. Performance of each of the following operations was evaluated: interpretation of sensitivity tests, detection of the resistance mechanism, and assessment of either inhibition halo size (disk diffusion method) or minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Results. Concordance in the detection of resistance mechanisms was 76.4%, 73.3%, and 66.7% for the K. pneumoniae PAHO-161, E. cloacae PAHO-166, and S. aureus PAHO- 165 strains, respectively. Concordance between the inhibition areas observed by the participating laboratories and the ranges established by the coordinating laboratory was acceptable for all three isolates, at 90.8%, 92.8%, and 88.9%, respectively. Conclusions. Overall concordance in on the detection of KPC, MBL, and VISA resistance mechanisms was 72.1%. We consider the national reference laboratories in Latin America capable of recognizing these emerging resistance mechanisms and expect that maximum levels of concordance will be reached in the future.